Beschreibung
Produktdetails
Einband
Taschenbuch
Erscheinungsdatum
01.04.2009
Verlag
VDMSeitenzahl
192
Maße (L/B/H)
22/15/1,2 cm
Gewicht
271 g
Sprache
Englisch
ISBN
978-3-639-08345-3
Issues involving the risks and benefits of human
subjects research converge at the intersection of
research in engineering, science, ethics, medicine,
and technology and society. By law, research
organizations must establish an institutional review
board (IRB) to decide whether to approve research
with human participants. With over 6500 IRBs in the
US, IRB decision-making can vary beyond
the basic federal guidelines. Both policymakers and
researchers increasingly are focusing on the
adequacy of the existing oversight system. As
tension mounts over applicability of the guidelines
to all human subjects research, examination of the
system is needed to increase understanding of how
committees actually decide whether to approve or
disapprove such research in their organizations. IRB
members roles, participation, expertise on the IRB
and relationship to perception of IRB decision-
making processes at seven leading U.S. research
universities are discussed. By questioning who the
experts are and how different members attribute
value to a research protocol on an IRB, we can begin
to address broader issues of expertise and public
understanding of science and research.
subjects research converge at the intersection of
research in engineering, science, ethics, medicine,
and technology and society. By law, research
organizations must establish an institutional review
board (IRB) to decide whether to approve research
with human participants. With over 6500 IRBs in the
US, IRB decision-making can vary beyond
the basic federal guidelines. Both policymakers and
researchers increasingly are focusing on the
adequacy of the existing oversight system. As
tension mounts over applicability of the guidelines
to all human subjects research, examination of the
system is needed to increase understanding of how
committees actually decide whether to approve or
disapprove such research in their organizations. IRB
members roles, participation, expertise on the IRB
and relationship to perception of IRB decision-
making processes at seven leading U.S. research
universities are discussed. By questioning who the
experts are and how different members attribute
value to a research protocol on an IRB, we can begin
to address broader issues of expertise and public
understanding of science and research.
Ein neues Kapitel für Ihre Bücher
Ein neues Kapitel für Ihre Bücher
Schenken Sie Ihren alten Schätzen ein zweites Leben: Einfach Barcode scannen, Versandetikett ausdrucken, Bücher verschicken und Thalia Geschenkkarte erhalten.
Jetzt verkaufenKundinnen und Kunden meinen
Verfassen Sie die erste Bewertung zu diesem Artikel
Helfen Sie anderen Kund*innen durch Ihre Meinung
Kurze Frage zu unserer Seite
Vielen Dank für Ihr Feedback
Wir nutzen Ihr Feedback, um unsere Produktseiten zu verbessern. Bitte haben Sie Verständnis, dass wir Ihnen keine Rückmeldung geben können. Falls Sie Kontakt mit uns aufnehmen möchten, können Sie sich aber gerne an unseren Kund*innenservice wenden.
zum Kundenservice