Innovation and Economic Growth in China - Evidence from Patent Statistics
-
- Taschenbuch
- eBook ausgewählt
-
Form:Einzelkauf Download
-
Sprache:Englisch
29,99 €
inkl. gesetzl. MwSt.Beschreibung
Produktdetails
Format
Kopierschutz
Nein
Family Sharing
Nein
Text-to-Speech
Nein
Erscheinungsdatum
01.09.2010
Verlag
GRINSeitenzahl
68 (Printausgabe)
Dateigröße
1010 KB
Auflage
1. Auflage
Sprache
Englisch
EAN
9783640694136
Master's Thesis from the year 2010 in the subject Economics - Economic Cycle and Growth, grade: 1.7, University of Applied Sciences Essen, language: English, abstract: China has demonstrated an enormously high rate of economic growth over a period of more than twenty years. In fact, China's economy advances to a driving force in order to overcome the consequences of the financial crisis in 2008. This is only one reason why China has become the major object for studying economic growth as shown by thousands of publications and articles. But up to now, there have been published only few papers dealing with China's
patenting activities. This is astonishing, given the fact that innovations expressed by patent counts are one of the key factors that drives long term growth and productivity.
Today emerging state's economies like in China turn more and more into knowledge-based economies, where intellectual property rights play an elementary role. Moreover, IP protection
in form of patents can increase (as intangible asset) firm's values. Furthermore, investment decisions are sufficiently influenced by the existence of a reliable patent system. While intellectual property and its protection have an essential impact on creating economic growth, the neglect of this relationship has much more negative influence on economy's development. If an invention can be costless copied by a competitor it would be impossible to cover
the costs of the development or even to gain a profit out of it. Therefore, it is necessary to think about efficient incentive systems for inventors in order to reward their efforts. Unfortunately, it proves difficult to establish a patent system that maximises social welfare by providing just enough incentives to invent, while limiting the temporary monopoly given to the patentee.
In general, strong patents (patent length, breadth and height) can encourage innovations but too strong patents could be contrary by reducing welfare. Given China's weak record of protecting intellectual property rights on the one hand and its
economic growth on the other hand, there seems to be a contradiction. But, a closer look reveals China's efforts for installing an efficient patent system. For example, after passing its
first Patent Law in 1986, China has amended its Patent Law several times in order to bring it in line with international norms, as well as to support its effort to enter the WTO in 2001.
However, China's enforcement system is still weak. The installation of China's patent system goes along with an incredible patent surge at annual growth rates of 20%.
patenting activities. This is astonishing, given the fact that innovations expressed by patent counts are one of the key factors that drives long term growth and productivity.
Today emerging state's economies like in China turn more and more into knowledge-based economies, where intellectual property rights play an elementary role. Moreover, IP protection
in form of patents can increase (as intangible asset) firm's values. Furthermore, investment decisions are sufficiently influenced by the existence of a reliable patent system. While intellectual property and its protection have an essential impact on creating economic growth, the neglect of this relationship has much more negative influence on economy's development. If an invention can be costless copied by a competitor it would be impossible to cover
the costs of the development or even to gain a profit out of it. Therefore, it is necessary to think about efficient incentive systems for inventors in order to reward their efforts. Unfortunately, it proves difficult to establish a patent system that maximises social welfare by providing just enough incentives to invent, while limiting the temporary monopoly given to the patentee.
In general, strong patents (patent length, breadth and height) can encourage innovations but too strong patents could be contrary by reducing welfare. Given China's weak record of protecting intellectual property rights on the one hand and its
economic growth on the other hand, there seems to be a contradiction. But, a closer look reveals China's efforts for installing an efficient patent system. For example, after passing its
first Patent Law in 1986, China has amended its Patent Law several times in order to bring it in line with international norms, as well as to support its effort to enter the WTO in 2001.
However, China's enforcement system is still weak. The installation of China's patent system goes along with an incredible patent surge at annual growth rates of 20%.
Kundinnen und Kunden meinen
Verfassen Sie die erste Bewertung zu diesem Artikel
Helfen Sie anderen Kund*innen durch Ihre Meinung
Kurze Frage zu unserer Seite
Vielen Dank für Ihr Feedback
Wir nutzen Ihr Feedback, um unsere Produktseiten zu verbessern. Bitte haben Sie Verständnis, dass wir Ihnen keine Rückmeldung geben können. Falls Sie Kontakt mit uns aufnehmen möchten, können Sie sich aber gerne an unseren Kund*innenservice wenden.
zum Kundenservice