Band 60
Beschreibung
Produktdetails
Einband
Paperback
Erscheinungsdatum
27.05.2022
Verlag
AschendorffSeitenzahl
318
Maße (L/B/H)
23/15,4/2,3 cm
Gewicht
557 g
Sprache
Deutsch, Italienisch
ISBN
978-3-402-16650-5
Questo volume analizza la parentesi orientale della controversia pelagiana (411-431). La prima parte prende in esame le modalità con cui Pelagio, Celestio e Giuliano d’Eclano, i principali membri del movimento pelagiano, sono stati accolti o respinti dai vescovi orientali. Infatti, è solo con il concilio di Efeso (431) che il pelagianesimo è diventato un’eresia diffusamente condannata in Oriente. La seconda parte si concentra sui polemisti anti-pelagiani latini residenti in Oriente, come Girolamo, Orosio e Mario Mercatore. Tramite il confronto tra la loro polemica anti-pelagiana e quella di Agostino, si è dimostrato che opporsi al pelagianesimo non ha significato necessariamente condividere in pieno la teologia agostiniana.
This volume analyzes the Eastern theater of the Pelagian controversy (411-431). The first part examines how Pelagius, Caelestius, and Julian of Aeclanum (the main protagonists of the Pelagian movement) were received by different Eastern bishops during the controversy. As will be seen, it was only at the Council of Ephesus (431) that Pelagianism became a heresy condemned widely in the East. The second part of this study turns to the Latin anti-Pelagian polemicists living in the East (e.g., Jerome, Orosius, and Marius Mercator). By comparing their anti-Pelagian efforts with Augustine’s, it will be shown that opposing Pelagianism did not necessarily require a full embrace of Augustinian theology.
This volume analyzes the Eastern theater of the Pelagian controversy (411-431). The first part examines how Pelagius, Caelestius, and Julian of Aeclanum (the main protagonists of the Pelagian movement) were received by different Eastern bishops during the controversy. As will be seen, it was only at the Council of Ephesus (431) that Pelagianism became a heresy condemned widely in the East. The second part of this study turns to the Latin anti-Pelagian polemicists living in the East (e.g., Jerome, Orosius, and Marius Mercator). By comparing their anti-Pelagian efforts with Augustine’s, it will be shown that opposing Pelagianism did not necessarily require a full embrace of Augustinian theology.
Ein neues Kapitel für Ihre Bücher
Ein neues Kapitel für Ihre Bücher
Schenken Sie Ihren alten Schätzen ein zweites Leben und erhalten dafür eine Thalia Geschenkkarte.
Noch keine Bewertungen vorhanden
Verfassen Sie die erste Bewertung zu diesem Artikel
Helfen Sie anderen Kundinnen und Kunden durch Ihre Meinung.
Kurze Frage zu unserer Seite
Vielen Dank für Ihr Feedback
Wir nutzen Ihr Feedback, um unsere Produktseiten zu verbessern. Bitte haben Sie Verständnis, dass wir Ihnen keine Rückmeldung geben können. Falls Sie Kontakt mit uns aufnehmen möchten, können Sie sich aber gerne an unseren Kund*innenservice wenden.
zum Kundenservice