Social inequality in Germany and Great Britain A comparison between Germany and Great Britain regarding the social inequality
-
- Einzelkauf Download ausgewählt
-
Sprache:Englisch
5,99 €
inkl. gesetzl. MwSt.Beschreibung
Produktdetails
Format
Kopierschutz
Nein
Family Sharing
Nein
Text-to-Speech
Nein
Erscheinungsdatum
29.11.2023
Verlag
GRINSeitenzahl
5 (Printausgabe)
Dateigröße
487 KB
Sprache
Englisch
EAN
9783346976772
Seminar paper from the year 2020 in the subject Sociology - Social System and Social Structure, grade: 2,0, University of Dortmund, language: English, abstract: I structure this paper from the general to the particular. In order to understand this topic, the first thing to do is to define the term "social inequality". This is followed by the topics of "Social Inequality in Germany" and "Social Inequality in England" and a comparison of Germany and England.
According to Hradil (2005), social inequality is about the unequal distribution of goods considered 'valuable' in a society. Possession or lack of these goods has a major impact on people's living conditions; people who have more 'valuable goods' are better off than those who have less. It should be noted that the value of a good has no universal validity and is flexible. Depending on historical developments or the spatial context, goods vary in value. Whether and to what extent a good is considered 'valuable' depends on the values that prevail in a society. It is through the possession of goods that those values can be realized (see Hradil, 2005, p.28). An example of a valuable good is work. This fulfils the social idea of financial security. Unemployed people are disadvantaged in many areas of life compared to those who have work; moreover, work can be differentiated into lower and higher paid jobs.
According to Hradil (2005), social inequality is about the unequal distribution of goods considered 'valuable' in a society. Possession or lack of these goods has a major impact on people's living conditions; people who have more 'valuable goods' are better off than those who have less. It should be noted that the value of a good has no universal validity and is flexible. Depending on historical developments or the spatial context, goods vary in value. Whether and to what extent a good is considered 'valuable' depends on the values that prevail in a society. It is through the possession of goods that those values can be realized (see Hradil, 2005, p.28). An example of a valuable good is work. This fulfils the social idea of financial security. Unemployed people are disadvantaged in many areas of life compared to those who have work; moreover, work can be differentiated into lower and higher paid jobs.
Noch keine Bewertungen vorhanden
Verfassen Sie die erste Bewertung zu diesem Artikel
Helfen Sie anderen Kundinnen und Kunden durch Ihre Meinung.
Kurze Frage zu unserer Seite
Vielen Dank für Ihr Feedback
Wir nutzen Ihr Feedback, um unsere Produktseiten zu verbessern. Bitte haben Sie Verständnis, dass wir Ihnen keine Rückmeldung geben können. Falls Sie Kontakt mit uns aufnehmen möchten, können Sie sich aber gerne an unseren Kund*innenservice wenden.
zum Kundenservice