The South China Sea dispute as a security dilemma The security dilemma in the post-Cold War era and its impacts on international relations
-
- Einzelkauf Download ausgewählt
-
Sprache:Englisch
5,99 €
inkl. gesetzl. MwSt.Beschreibung
Produktdetails
Format
Kopierschutz
Nein
Family Sharing
Nein
Text-to-Speech
Nein
Erscheinungsdatum
28.11.2016
Verlag
GRINSeitenzahl
7 (Printausgabe)
Dateigröße
1087 KB
Auflage
1. Auflage
Sprache
Englisch
EAN
9783668351455
Essay from the year 2016 in the subject Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict, Security, grade: 1,3, James Cook University (College of Arts, Society and Education), course: International Relations and Foreign Policy, language: English, abstract: The essay is an examination of the security dilemma and its impact on contemporary global politics. This is done by using the example of the South China Sea dispute and by outlining the lasting impacts of this conflicts on international relations.
The term security dilemma was first described by the German-American scholar of international relations and law John Herz in his 1951 book "Political Realism and Political Idealism"; however, the idea can be found already in the work of Immanuel Kant. The security dilemma is a model used in international relations to understand and explain the behaviour of states. Herz defined it as "a structural notion in which the self-help attempts of states to look after their security needs tend, regardless of intention, to lead to rising insecurity for others as each interprets its own measures as defensive and measures of others as potentially threatening" (Herz, 1951, p. 7).
The term security dilemma was first described by the German-American scholar of international relations and law John Herz in his 1951 book "Political Realism and Political Idealism"; however, the idea can be found already in the work of Immanuel Kant. The security dilemma is a model used in international relations to understand and explain the behaviour of states. Herz defined it as "a structural notion in which the self-help attempts of states to look after their security needs tend, regardless of intention, to lead to rising insecurity for others as each interprets its own measures as defensive and measures of others as potentially threatening" (Herz, 1951, p. 7).
Noch keine Bewertungen vorhanden
Verfassen Sie die erste Bewertung zu diesem Artikel
Helfen Sie anderen Kundinnen und Kunden durch Ihre Meinung.
Kurze Frage zu unserer Seite
Vielen Dank für Ihr Feedback
Wir nutzen Ihr Feedback, um unsere Produktseiten zu verbessern. Bitte haben Sie Verständnis, dass wir Ihnen keine Rückmeldung geben können. Falls Sie Kontakt mit uns aufnehmen möchten, können Sie sich aber gerne an unseren Kund*innenservice wenden.
zum Kundenservice